We all would be monkeys swinging in trees! Chimamanda Ngozi
Adichie’s recent presentation at TED Global 2009 in Oxford is delightfully
instructive. In the video, available on Youtube, Chimamanda spoke about the
danger of a single story. How a story can distort ones thinking about people
and countries. That lack of balance in a story which invariably sticks and
informs worldviews. She wasn’t posturing. A string of humorous personal
anecdotes laced her 19-minute presentation.
A blog that posted the video commented on her poise and grace. Her
message was more catching. For far too long Africa has been parcelled together
as one country. Chimamanda recalls an announcement during her flight to London.
Passengers were asked to donate towards a charity project for India, Africa and
other countries. The African Union (AU) has 52 member states. Never mind that
the 19th century scramble for Africa parcelled the continent into disparate
groups.
Or that slave trade and business in commodities (agricultural and
mineral) – a partnership between a few venal African and Western (and now
East-Asian) people – has persistently dogged the continent’s development.
Indeed there are exceptions: Botswana.
Yet this ambiguity about Africa remains. Always at the mercy of what
Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala calls the “neighbourhood effect”. Bad news about, say,
Guinea sullies the image of the entire continent. No less, news about Zimbabwe,
Darfur, Nigeria, Kenya etc, have the same effect.
Of late, Ghana and South Africa, to some extent, receive positive
coverage in the western media. What’s striking is that unpicking Africa seems
tedious when the story is told by another. Most of the time, it’s about chaos,
catastrophe, carnage and corruption. Mind you, we (indigenous commentators,
authors and reporters) share part of the blame – it’s easier to denigrate than
constructively criticise. Take the good chunk of African literature
that have received rave reviews and awards.
After reading E.C.Osondu’s prize winning story Waiting, I came away with the impression that he must have taken Binyavanga
Wainaina’s How
to write about Africa to
heart. “In your text, treat Africa as if it were one country. It is hot and
dusty with rolling grasslands and huge herds of animals and tall, thin people
who are starving.”
Similarly, Fr Uwem Akpan, a Nigerian priest who’s Say You’re One
Them, a collection of short stories, just made Oprah Winfrey’s book club.
Oprah Winfrey noted that "This is the first time I have ever chosen a
collection of short stories. Each one of them left me gasping and profoundly
moved". The book is described as a “singular collection [that] will also
take the reader inside Nigeria, Benin and Ethiopia, revealing in beautiful
prose the harsh realities of life in Africa for children.” At least the book
differentiates between African countries.
But the tales are no less harrowing as Martin Meredith’s The
State of Africa: A History of Fifty Years of Independence, a deftly
written book that traverses the woes of post-independence Africa. I’m yet to
get myself to finish it. To be sure, it details the rapaciousness of different
leaders in cohort with their American, British, French, Chinese, Spanish and
Cuban peers. With such stories as a staple one may almost be forgiven for
accepting that Africa is hopeless. A view The Economist held
in 2000.
That “undue harshness” was made up for with an October 2008 editorial
“There is hope – despite the persistence of Africa’s natural and man-made
horrors, the latest trend is cheeringly positive.” All the same, Africa’s hope
and prospects come down to why she’s capital-starved. Most of Africa’s capital
is abroad. Either as money filched by dodgy politicians and businesspeople or
Africans that have migrated abroad. There’s nothing wrong with relocating,
especially when strife is too rife.
But there’s a whole lot wrong with asset-stripping. Those who divvy up
state coffers get away with these horrors because of shady western
businesspeople and banks abroad. Sanusi
Lamido, the CBN
governor, nails the issue on the head: “I think that corruption is a two-way
street: there are those who give and those who take. We must fight it from both
ends.”
If numbers could kill
It’s been alleged that some British expats, acting as middlemen for
Securency, a firm partly-owned by the Reserve Bank of Australia, bribed
Nigerian officials with $10 million to print the new polymer naira notes.
Naturally, the money trail is shrouded in secrecy – no thanks to financial
centres, like London, that permit no-questions asked financial transactions.
The consequence is no “small fry” according to a Tax
Justice Network (TJN)
blog post.
Research from University of Massachusetts, Amherst on money that has
left the shores of 40 African countries says “Real capital flight over the
35-year period amounted to about $420 billion (in 2004 dollars) for the 40
countries as a whole. Including imputed interest earnings, the accumulated
stock of capital flight was about $607 billion as of end-2004.”
James Ibori, Jonathan Dariye, DSP Alamasiegha and the
Nigerians implicated in the Halliburton cash-for-contract scandal and goodness
knows how many others, have found havens for hiding egregious businesses and
dirty money. Such places, the banks and the laws that permit financial secrecy,
aid and abet capital flight. To be sure, there’s has been cooperation to stamp
capital flows that fund terrorism. However, isn’t it ironic that countries
starved of funds, which rightly belong to them, can become havens for
terrorists?
In short ‘vulnerable’ sub-Saharan Africa is a net creditor to the rest
of the world. This amount far exceeds what Africa receives in aid annually or
requires for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Undetected, most of it
stays out and of course, in cash-strapped times as these, such money will ‘aid’
the recovery of ‘beneficiary’ countries. Just when the billionth African will
be born this year.
Patrick Smith, editor-in-chief of The Africa Report, thinks
this demographic bulge can be turned into a dividend. Africa is the fastest
urbanising continent. Her population is the youngest and growing ahead of
others. These changes, coupled with the right policies – expansion of
intra-Africa trade, better governance, pro-growth regulation, a healthy and
educated population can set African countries on a sustainable growth path.
With Egypt, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa as “economic locomotives” Africa
may just break free.
Innovation: biofuel cookers (these tackle poverty and reduce carbon
emissions), mobile money (to extend banking to the unbanked). Irrigated farms
plus fertilisers, seeds, agro-input centres - for direct procurement and
distribution of agricultural inputs - backed by credit must be used to spur
Africa’s way overdue green revolution.
In addition, industrialisation by harnessing low-skilled farmers that
migrate to the city will be a boon for labour-intensive manufacturing clusters.
Thermal, wind and solar power stations will generate decent electricity. (It’s
said the Inga dam in Democratic Republic of Congo can generate enough
electricity for the world). Rising productivity and prosperity contribute to
political and socioeconomic cohesion.
Alas, all this could be a pie-in-the-sky. A “political time bomb with
tens of millions of hungry and hungry city dwellers.” Scores of idle, jobless
and frustrated young men can be a threat to political and social stability –
pictures of Niger Delta militants giving up their arms isn’t a film trick. Each
African government will do well to face reality and discard rhetoric. Quit
spoofing the people. Pluralism: multi-ethnicity and religion differences, is a
strength not a threat.
The days of quibbling about which cronies get what contracts or
ministerial positions must end. Rather a competent, honest and service-centred
government should be the focus. It will present Africa as potential pole of
growth as the world gravitates from the west to the east. A continent not just
in need of assistance but partnership to curb capital flight, promote trade,
investment and gradually discard the stereotype of death, disease and disaster.
|